
Henry Cotton dispensing justice in Bengal (From Wikipedia)
A friend of mine recently gave me something he had copied from Peter Drucker’s classic work, “Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices.” Drucker has been a particular favorite of his, ever since he studied under him at Claremont. I was struck by the similarities between Village Missionaries and Drucker’s classic description of the Indian Civil Service.
The Indian Civil Service contributed far more to India than most would think possible. According to Drucker:
Politically, the history of British rule is a history of muddle, indecision, lack of direction, and, in the last analysis, failure. What kept the British in control and power for two hundred years was, in part, India’s weakness and disunity. But above all, the British stayed in power because of a supreme administrative accomplishment: The Indian Civil Service. In its greatest period . . . it never numbered more than a thousand men. Most were very young, mere lads in their early twenties, for life expectancy was brutally short for the white man in India’s hostile climate, in which malaria and dysentery were endemic and cholera an annual visitor. (Drucker, p. 403)
Likewise, Village Missionaries have done unlikely but extraordinary things in difficult places.
Like Village Missionaries, the civil servants ministered in isolated areas. According to Drucker:
Most of these young men of the alien race who administered the huge subcontinent were stationed in total isolation in small villages or on dusty crossroads in which they did not see for months on end anyone who spoke their language and shared their concerns. Only a few survived long enough to retire, with modest pensions, to the England whence they had come and of which they always dreamed. (Drucker, p. 403)
Thankfully, many more Village Missionaries survive until retirement but the work is isolated and the pension is small! Of course, perhaps things would have been different for the civil servants if they had Skype, Facebook, and cell phones!
Now comes a not so flattering part of Drucker’s analysis. I wouldn’t say this about Village Missionaries but the world might think the same thing about our ministry and missionaries:
These young men who administered British India were rather dull and uninteresting. After a short apprenticeship, they were put into an assignment of their own to sink or swim. These men were younger sons of poor country parsons, with no prospects at home and little standing in English society. Their pay was low; and such opportunities for loot or gain as their predecessors had enjoyed in the swashbuckling days of the East India Company . . . had . . . been completely eliminated by both law and custom. (Drucker, p. 404)
“Dull and uninteresting,” “sink or swim,” low pay sound somewhat familiar to things I’ve heard about Village Missionaries.
Yet, how unexpectedly and how well did these Indian Civil Servants minister! Overcoming huge obstacles:
These untrained, not very bright, and totally inexperienced youngsters ran districts comparable in size and population to small European countries. And they ran them practically all by themselves with a minimum of direction and supervision from the top. Some, of course, became casualties and broke under the strain, falling victim to alcohol, to native women or—the greatest danger of them all—to sloth. But most of them did what they were expected to do, and did it reasonably well. They gave India, for the first time in its long and tragic history, peace, a measure of freedom from famine, and a little security of life, worship, and property. They administered justice impartially and, at least as far as they themselves were concerned, honestly and without corruption. They collected taxes, by and large, impartially and equitably. They did not make policy; and in the end they foundered because they had none. But they administered, and administered well. (Drucker, p. 404)
How much more could be said for Village Missionaries as they administer the things of God! Some have succumbed but many more have been used by God to accomplish great things for God’s Kingdom. Unnoticed by the world but, I’m convinced, noticed and appreciated by God!
Drucker then accounts for the success of the Indian Civil Servants:
The jobs the young men were assigned were big and challenging. There was enough scope in each of them to keep even a good man interested and occupied for many years. The job was the young man’s own job, and not a job as an “assistant” to anybody. He was accountable. He was responsible. And it was up to him to organize the job as he saw fit. Performance standards were high and uncompromising. A young, basically untrained and unprepared amateur was expected to give perfect justice; to be totally impartial; to maintain public order, safety on the roads and in the villages, and religious and civil peace. And he had to do this by persuasion, by the authority of his own person and by his mere presence; to have to invoke force, for instance to call in the military, was considered failure. And while the individual job was anonymous, the Service had high pride in itself and a deep commitment to standards and mission. It was imbued with the highest spirit. (Drucker, pp. 404-405)
How uncanny the similarities between Village Missionaries and Indian Civil Servants! Who could find a job with a broader scope or greater responsibility? A somewhat “untrained and unprepared amateur” is expected to “shepherd the church of God which He purchased with his own blood” (Acts 20:28 NKJV). And Village Missionaries do it all by persuasion but with no military as back up! Of course, we do have District Representatives! Moreover, every time I gather with Village Missionaries I marvel at the humility yet the “high pride” and the “deep commitment to standards and mission.” You can read about one such gathering by clicking on this link.
For many years our communications involving Village Missions, especially when it comes to recruiting, has tended to focus on the great need in rural areas. Great need does exist but great accomplishment has occurred as well! The accomplishment can only be attributed to God working through extremely dedicated and self-sacrificing servants in the often forgotten communities across the United States and Canada. What God has done through Village Missionaries has great significance not just for those communities and churches but also for the church as a whole.
We need many more Village Missionaries in this mold and when we have them, God accomplishes great things. Each of interested in Village Missions and rural communities needs to understand the importance of gathering a new army of Village Missionaries. Would you commit to pray that God would call not just anyone but new Village Missionaries in the mold of those who have so faithfully served? Would you commit to sending just such a Village Missionary out of your church? Would you commit to contacting anyone you can think of about becoming a Village Missionary provided they can serve as we expect them to serve?
Not only because of the need but also for the great things that God will do!